Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeroprediction


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough participation to establish a consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Aeroprediction

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No statement of notability, no substance about product, and appears to be an ad for the S/W (complete with sales contact info). Refs appear to have nothing to do with the S/W itself. Askari Mark (Talk) 02:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  —Askari Mark (Talk) 02:47, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per this Google Books search. Refinements in the Aeroprediction Code Based on Recent Wind Tunnel Data provides some detailed information about this code. I also found some information about this in Aeronautical engineering. Cunard (talk) 05:40, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Actually, from the ones I've been able to examine, most sources either announce refinements added in the latest version or simply mention that the code was used in a particular study. I've yet to find any that describe the product overall or that independently assess it.  This makes it hard to expand beyond the "reads-like-an-ad" condition it is presently in.  Askari Mark (Talk) 03:21, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.