Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aethel Partners


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. After removing the sockpuppet votes, there doesn't seem to be any consensus for anything other than deleting the article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:54, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Aethel Partners

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No sign of In-depth, independent coverage. Fails WP:ORG Behind the moors (talk) 20:06, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies,  and England.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:24, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Spiderone - can you please delete the AfD tag on this page. The coverage is independent and there are several independent and reliable sources in the article. Thanks PeacefulJack (talk) 16:28, 22 March 2022 (UTC) see Sockpuppet investigations/Cabritos  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:22, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi @PeacefulJack no one will delete the AfD tag. Why are you so concerned about the discussion running? Please disclose any conflict of interest that you may have. Star   Mississippi  16:35, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi @Star Mississippi I have been very active in wikipedia for a long time. I declare I have no conflict of interest with any of my work in wikipedia. I love football and realized there was no page. Please let me know how can I be more clear on this PeacefulJack (talk) 22:47, 22 March 2022 (UTC) see Sockpuppet investigations/Cabritos  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:22, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Vote keep Ricardosantossilva (talk) 15:57, 26 March 2022 (UTC)  see Sockpuppet investigations/Cabritos  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:20, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * — Ricardosantossilva (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Star   Mississippi  19:06, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi @Behind the moors - I disagree with this article being deleted. Article is well written and from reliable sources. Thank you ScottWillis45 (talk) 11:48, 23 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment there do look to be sources listed on the Portuguese Wiki article, that look like it may pass WP:GNG, and could be added to this English language article. Would like the input of a Portuguese speaker without a COI on the sources there though. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Although on the other hand, Aethel Mining already exists (so this page seems like a duplicate), and they failed to obtain Novo Banco according to the text on that article, and they may or not actually become owners of Chelsea. All of which is meaning that I'm leaning towards delete. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:14, 23 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Also, not happy about possible COI so best to kick this out. No Great Shaker (talk) 17:11, 23 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Dear @Behind the moorsI am a representative of Aethel Group and its founders Ricardo Santos Silva and Aba Schubert. Could you please delete the 3 pages. These pages are abusive and should be deleted immediately. Please text me here if you want to discuss this further. Wikipedia does not allow me to include my email. Thank you and best regards Rhead1967 (talk) 16:52, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * NOT authorized content Rhead1967 (talk) 17:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * @Behind the moors@PeacefulJack@Star Mississippi@No Great Shaker
 * Can someone please help me. This is very urgent. I am a representative of Aethel Group and its founders Ricardo Santos Silva and Aba Schubert. Could you please delete the 3 pages. These pages are abusive and should be deleted immediately. Please text me here if you want to discuss this further. Wikipedia does not allow me to include my email. Thank you and best regards Rhead1967 Rhead1967 (talk) 17:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia does not require authorization from the subject of articles, any more than a newspaper would require authorization to report on a person or company, and there is nothing abusive about the articles (aside from the desire of your clients that they not exist). The articles may well be deleted due to a lack of notability (I have not looked at either article and am not now weighing in on the discussion), but your request for suppression as a representative of the company and its principals does not carry any weight in this discussion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:09, 24 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Looking this over, I think Aethel Mining seems to have enough coverage to warrant a page, but this as the parent company doesn't really have much beyond the potential Chelsea acquisition, and that just as one of the potential buyers. I can't see this as having its own notability. Delete Tony Fox (arf!) 18:25, 24 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Aethel Mining Vannostrand1949 (talk) 23:34, 25 March 2022 (UTC) see Sockpuppet investigations/Cabritos  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:21, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * BoldKeep Bold 85.255.233.208 (talk) 00:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:NCORP; nobody has provided any evidence that this company meets WP:CORPDEPTH; passing mentions here and there do not meet the standard Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:26, 29 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.