Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Affimity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 20:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Affimity

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article might not meet notability standards for websites. Article was created by the Digital Marketing Specialist working for the company. TOW 19:32, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I myself reviewed this at NPP and am not convincing how this shows the applicable notability, too soon at best. SwisterTwister   talk  20:18, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
 * See WP:NEXIST. Topic notability is based upon available sources, not the state of sourcing in articles. North America1000 03:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:13, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:13, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

 References
 * Keep and copy edit – Meets WP:CORPDEPTH. Some source examples are listed below. North America1000 03:32, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * "Affimity: Social engagement platform for like-minded people". Firstpost.
 * "Social Networking Startup, Affimity launches special channels to support the Startup community". The Hans India.
 * Business Standard
 * The Times of India
 * Business Standard
 * The Economic Times (2 ¶)
 * Delete: The sources offered and that I've found cover almost entirely the public offering and not much else. There's one source that's comprehensive.  And the others are interviews of employees.  The entire article isn't properly cited, on top of it, and still reads like promo text even after 's edits to the page. Chrisw80 (talk) 04:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Lack of high quality sources. SJK (talk) 06:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.