Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afflete


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Athlete. v/r - TP 01:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Afflete

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unsourced neologism with no indication of notability. Eeekster (talk) 03:23, 7 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect - to Athlete as a borderline case of "plausible typos". → Σ  τ  c . 03:48, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Possibly Ali G might spell it that way, but very few real people would.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  04:31, 7 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete clearly non-notable, searching the web shows this isn't being used anywhere, so probably something made up. Redirect is possible, but I think so borderline that just deleting is a better outcome. Sparthorse (talk) 03:57, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Eeekster and Sparthorse. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:02, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete This isn't so much an article about a neologism as it is an unpersuasive argument that Wikipedia should have an article about this. No, we shouldn't.  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  04:18, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Σ.  —  Jeff G. ツ  (talk)  ''' 04:19, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable. A google-search returns no indication that it is widely used in the context mentioned in the article. Instead the search results are quite worrisome and a significant number of them appear to contain offensive and/or racist language, but absolutely nothing to verify the statements in the article. --Phileasson (talk) 08:21, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 7 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not finding reliable sources to qualify topic inclusion. Northamerica1000 (talk) 21:51, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete; an idiom that is derived from the the words "affiliate" & "athlete" and refers specifically to describing an Affiliate Athlete; an individual with a strong all around 'affletic' ability that indicates the potential to succeed and multiple affiliate marketing positions. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 04:30, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. Bearian (talk) 21:22, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Miskwito (talk) 20:41, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as per above, but recreate as a redirect, also as above. (is that a valid position to take?) Stuartyeates (talk) 08:56, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.