Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afghan Jalebi (Ya Baba) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:58, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Afghan Jalebi (Ya Baba)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Continuing from previous AfD, the closing admin in their no-consensus-note stated that "The fundamental debate here is about the quality of the sources, and neither side has made a convincing enough argument to negate the other side." I am hence providing a reference analysis here. Following reference analysis is based on references used in this revision (19:05, 28 September 2015) of the article. The song still fails WP:NSONG which states "Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." (emphasis added). The following source analysis is provided in order to establish how the emphasized clauses of the notability guideline are not met.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:52, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:53, 6 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment: I think this AfD is not valid. As per Renominating for deletion, If the XfD discussion was closed as “no consensus”, do not renominate the page for at least two months. And its been just 1 month since last AfD was closed as "No Consensus". -- Human 3015   TALK   10:47, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Template:Deletion essay says "Essays are not Wikipedia policies or guidelines. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints." I had asked the closing admin to reopen the first AfD in order to post this. But he didn't reply my post. Hence the new AfD. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:54, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Best way was to go for Deletion review. Renominating article for deletion within 1 month is really not worth, its more like wasting time of the community and involved editors. Anyway, I have given my opinion regarding validity of this AfD, closing admin will decide rest of the things, I'm done with this AfD. Best Luck. -- Human 3015   TALK   11:12, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * DRV is also dealt by community and "wasting time" would happen there too. And DRVs are meant to reconsider the "decision" and not when newer arguments are made. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:34, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:41, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I have no idea why it was not deleted before, there seems to be almost no detailed mention of this in any RS. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 06:33, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NSONGS per the reference analyses table. Faizan (talk) 07:19, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I think some people will not die with peace unless this article will get deleted. I propose to delete this article because I don't want that above hounder's soul to hound me sometime in future if this article remains on Wikipedia. Hounding on Wikipedia is acceptable but I can't afford soul of these people in future, so it will be better to delete this article so that these people can die in peace in future and their soul will not hound me. Hope so. I request to closing admin to delete this article and liberate some souls. Actually I don't want this headache anymore, if this AfD closed as "no consensus" or "keep" then above hounders will again nominate it for deletion after 2-3 months so it will be better to delete it now and liberate these innocent narrow minded people. I think liberation of souls is more important than this useless song article. -- Human 3015   TALK   13:22, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh the high levels of melodrama! SMirC-puke.svg §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:20, 16 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep – the article and references look fine to me. Oculi (talk) 11:24, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for reference analysis provided. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 22:21, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Phantom.The Avengers (talk) 01:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.