Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afl challenge (psp)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 01:02, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Afl challenge (psp)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable computer game Passportguy (talk) 11:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 12:13, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment- though article is currently weak, game is covered in several articles including, and Dialectric (talk) 13:23, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:15, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Although a weak article, i did a little cleanup. For a future game it seems to have received some attention (per above) which would pull it away from being non-notable. Salavat (talk) 17:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * One news article is not the attention an article needs to be created. - Mgm|(talk) 10:24, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * But the article has already been created, plus the release is only like two months away. Its bound to get reviews as with most video games these days and would seem to be pointless deleting the article. Its not like its a game that is so far of in the future that it could end up not happening. Salavat (talk) 15:18, 8 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per Salavat. YOWUZA  Talk 2 me! 16:22, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Since a simple Google search clearly shows that the unreleased game is sufficiently notable, I fail to see any reason in this AFD nomination. Why didn't you just tag it with  ?
 * Random results from http://www.google.com/search?q=AFL+Challenge+PSP :
 * http://www.kotaku.com.au/2009/05/first-look-at-afl-challenge-for-psp/
 * http://www.qj.net/AFL-Challenge-and-Rugby-League-Challenge-confirmed-for-the-PSP/pg/49/aid/131071
 * http://pspupdates.qj.net/AFL-Challenge/cid/5651
 * http://psp.ign.com/objects/143/14347503.html
 * http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/76306/default.aspx
 * http://www.gamespot.com/psp/sports/aflchallenge/index.html — Rankiri (talk) 17:30, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * A reason why this might be viewed as insignificant is because AFL is not played as widely as soccer, cricket or other truly international sports. However within Australia AFL games often get as high as 13% sales, for example on the PS-2 an AFL game was sold to 13% of those who bought PS-2's making it the highest selling PS-2 game in Australia. These games account for a significant portion of a significant market and they should not be deleted.--Senor Freebie (talk) 08:11, 14 May 2009 (UTC)