Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AfriMusic Song Contest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  00:24, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

AfriMusic Song Contest

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Ref bombed promotional spam. Non notable organistion/contest. If there is any notability hidden I suggest TNT as this is so far from appropriate for an encyclopedia it's almost funny. Article is bombarded with primary, press releases, facebook, PR and non mentions. The unrelated "history" section does have some RSs but they provide no coverage of this online contest. duffbeerforme (talk) 01:04, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. I am the page creator, though I haven't actually done much, a few other people have done all the work on the page. I agree that there are way too many references, and they should definitely be cleaned up, but the contest is definitely notable. It's a Eurovision-counterpart, with the winner of AfriMusic even performing at the Eurovision pre-shows. AfriMusic is indeed online at the moment, as far as I know, but that doesn't make it less notable. The page is written well. It doesn't, in my opinion, seem promotional at all. Not any more than pages for similar contests anyway. Several pages link to it, and it has a fair amount of monthly visitors. No reason to delete it, in my opinion. Kaffe42 (talk) 20:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 01:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is true that the sourcing could be better, but the competition has still been covered by specific articles in Deutsche Welle (1) and potentially Daily News (Harare) (rotted) and some other newspapers which appear to be WP:RS. As such, I don't think it can be argued WP:GNG isn't met? The fact that its 2020 version is online is not relevant. —Brigade Piron (talk) 15:59, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.