Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Africa Movie Academy Award for Most Promising Actor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Per WP:SK, nominator effectively withdrew (see merge !vote and last comment) and no outstanding delete !votes. Merge request goes on the talk page. (non-admin closure) Ansh666 06:20, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Africa Movie Academy Award for Most Promising Actor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Award of unclear notabilty relying entirely on a single Primary Source Wikicology (talk) 13:05, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:13, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:13, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:13, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:13, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge: Article WP:FAILN. The article do not meet WP:GNG. I suggest its merging with the article Africa Movie Academy Award Wikicology (talk) 15:26, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: That's a category of a very notable award. That's how it goes for other awards of the same kind. Do you know how bulky the AMAA article can become if everything about it is "Jam-packed" into one article?--Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:09, 2 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:SPINOFF "Sometimes, when an article gets long, a section of the article is made into its own article, and the handling of the subject in the main article is condensed to a brief summary. This is completely normal Wikipedia procedure." 24.151.10.165 (talk) 20:21, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: let's Understand the fact that wikipedia is not a blog or social media where anything goes. It is an encyclopedia. Nothing is too bulky to be encyclopedia. I see no reason why we can't merge it with the AMAA award. I had read both article. Since the AMAA section is yet to be bulky l suggest we should merge it. I don't gain anything seeing good article been deleted. Wikicology (talk) 20:42, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Nominating an article for deletion and immediately !voting "merge" is not the best practice. See WP:MERGE, if you want to merge. See also Article size. There may be relevant WP:WikiProject Film guidelines, as well. Cheers. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 21:54, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: @24.151.10.165. The article was proposed for deletion prior to the discovery of existing AMAA article. That was why I immediately suggested its merging with AMAA to proect/prevent its possible deletion at the end of concensus. You will also agree with me that no independent WP:Reliable Source validated its notability prior to its nomination for deletion. We all knows that the content of an article do not determine its notability as per GNG but WP:Reliable Source no mater how beautifuly an article is wrriten,  Reliable source determine wether we keep it here on wikipedia or merge. Thanks for your contribution.Wikicology (talk) 23:27, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.