Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/African Computer Scientists Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. CSD#G12 of http://acsaa.getafricaonline.com/About+ACSA -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 11:27, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

African Computer Scientists Association

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Advertising and seems to fail WP:GNG The Banner talk 12:49, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  13:22, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  13:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  13:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Delete Despite the claims in the article, I can't find any reliable sources on line that this computer organization with hundreds of thousands of members exists. I suspect this is some combination of a hoax or an attempt to pad someone's resume. SchreiberBike talk 18:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)


 * |WP:ORG|Notability requirements for non-profit organizations


 * Keep: References are available. I cannot add them myself, but here they are. RefsAvailable


 * African Union endorses the €100 Euros ICT Fund

Currently A.U estimated ACSA a Number of  ACSA Members as Tree Hundred and twenty nine (329) Membership of Professors, One Hundred and two (102) Doctors and Nine hundred and eighty seven (987)Students with an extra large number of Computer Professionals.
 * African Union endorses the €100 Euros ICT Project Fund to ACSA
 * African Computer Scientists Association

Do not Delete- First of all, the administrator was clearly correct in declining a deletion because the Article was first seen to be missing some right figures and important points. I am a Professor of Computer Science and an information security professional. But let me say I am not posting about my business or profession... I am posting about the the African Computer Scientists Association and thus contributing to the topic. •	 Those who may still suggest the deletion of this Article may be a little confused and having problems with the information accuracy in this Article and have no knowledge of the subject. Enough references are available to support the African Computer Scientists Association which we all know as a very recognized Scientists Association in Africa. •	You can also performed enough search with the contents. ACSA is not a fringe Organization. Only a subject matter expert can write about this Article, There seems  to be  some little typing mistake and omission in the writing moments,  the Article’s information provided may have been misspelled or  wrongly produced in the Article line,  else  confusion  of figures in the Subject line. This Article must not be removed until one have enough cross-check  all the necessary references and improvement for it further  expansion  ... I have added supporting  informations  by a reliable source  and confirmed this article qualified  on Wikipedia's notability guidelines. African Union endorses the €100 Euros ICT Fund African Union endorses the €100 Euros ICT Project Fund to ACSA  African Computer Scientists Association Thank you for your contributions. DANIEL OBUOBI (talk)  Information Security Expert ]] 11:03, 6 June 2013 (UTC)  11:28, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep: References are available. I cannot add them myself, but here they are.


 * 1) The administrator did not decline the deletion of this artcle. No decision has been taken as it is still under discussion
 * 2) Conform WP:OO, original research is not allowed.
 * 3) There are no sources given. Not at all. Only reliable third party sources can determine if this organisation is important enough for a place on Wikipedia. So we need independent sources who write about the organisation.
 * 4) External links should add something to the article. Wikipedia is not a linkfarm.
 * The Banner talk 22:02, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.