Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/African Unification Front


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 02:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

African Unification Front

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

They exist, but I wasn't coninced that they meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG (lathough it seems like something which should be notable). Has been tagged for notability for over 7 years; hopefully we can now resolve it. Sending WP:APPNOTE to, ,. Boleyn (talk) 12:32, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 19:42, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 19:42, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 14:38, 1 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 01:35, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: The organisation's website is not linked in the article, it is this one. They claimed "millions of supporters". From the website it looks as if the organisation ceased around 2003/2004. A number of references found in books: mostly list entries and citations of the AUF's publications, but there is also "The idea of creating the AU [ African Union ] was revived in the mid-1990s as a result of the efforts of the African Unification Front." It appears to have had important influence in its time Noyster  (talk),  11:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. While most searches return little, as Noyster points out, a search on Books returns quite a few credible sources. The article definitely needs work, however.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:19, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.