Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/African Wild Dog Conservancy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to African wild dog. (and please no copyright violations). Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

African Wild Dog Conservancy

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No significant coverage to meet WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 01:46, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to African wild dog. Joyous! | Talk 02:03, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Organizations,  and Kenya.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:35, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to African wild dog per Joyous! - the article was created back in 2007 by an SPA; was edited in October 2011 by two more SPAs; and has not been improved since, so it certainly looks promotional (WP:ADV) with (ancient) conflicts of interest (WP:COI). There are passing mentions of the charity on the web. It seems a worthy cause deserving of a very brief mention in the target article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:44, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello,
 * I've gone in and updated new content on the African Wild Dog Conservancy page to enrich it. I've done my best as the author of the original content to do so. Could you please clarify why today's updates were rolled back? If there are any copyright infringements present, I'm unaware of them. Thanks. 1enchilada (talk) 19:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * It seems that the Administrator who rolled your edits back did so because of a copyright violation, as they gave the edit comment "Copyright issue re https://www.awdconservancy.org/biodiversity%20hotspots.html". You should be aware that you are not allowed to copy from the Wild Dog Conservancy website any more than you can copy from anybody else's website, it's still a breach of copyright. If you are going to edit here you do need to learn the basics of Wikipedia policy. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:49, 15 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Merge per Joyous and Chiswick Chap. It lacks sigcov and looks overly promotional. SilverTiger12 (talk) 20:02, 18 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.