Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/African cherry orange


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep --JAranda &#124; watz sup 00:58, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

African cherry orange
There is hardly any information on this webpage, and it should be deleted. Jakewater 00:40, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep real fruit. &hearts;&hearts;purpl  e  feltangel  &hearts;  &hearts;  01:39, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep all known botanical species (and create redirects for alternative names and species synonym if it's kept). Being a stub has never been a reason for deletion, and there is a tremendous amount of information in the taxobox alone. &mdash; mendel &#9742; 02:50, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. DS 03:19, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, but where will it end? Will we have South American raspberry kumquat next? Kappa 04:39, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Wait until you see my Midwestern Puppymelon. Oh, they laughed at me at the Botanical Society, but I'll show them. I'll show them all! - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 12:01, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * We have vampire watermelon, I'm really not sure it can get any sillier. Keep this, by the way. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 15:43, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep since it is used by humans and some information is available. There are too many species on Earth to include them all, though. -- Kjkolb 05:42, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, real botanical species. - Mgm|(talk) 11:32, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep fruit (unless they're the products of mad science, of course). - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 12:01, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as WP:V fruit... and what is wrong with mad science? Mmmm, Frankenfruit.--Isotope23 16:46, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. No argument for deletion. - A Link to the Past (talk) 21:11, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep needs a picture!--Newyorktimescrossword 23:15, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Mendel. Denni &#9775; 02:17, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep no valid justification for deletion. chowells 21:56, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Juicy. Klonimus 05:24, 28 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.