Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afrisecaism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page &#x260E;  ) 11:39, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Afrisecaism
Virtually no significant Google hits; none in Google Books. Reads like original research. —Sesel 02:43, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -sounds like a first-hand account of unaccredited research.Blnguyen 05:46, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Blnguyen &mdash; ciphergoth 11:09, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Blnguyen.--み使い Mitsukai 13:54, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Isotope23 17:13, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Depending on whether this article is deleted or not, this anon's edits are mainly regarding this article in what appears to be an attempt to increase the number of pages that link to it. Don't know enough about the subject to present a vote. --Dinosaurdarrell 19:30, 10 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.