Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afro-Australia Music and Movie Awards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 01:32, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Afro-Australia Music and Movie Awards

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable awards. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:12, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 23:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 27 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable. Would've supported keep if its organizers had articles. Delibzr (talk) 03:34, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete You'd figure an "Afro-Australian" something-or-other would be at least notable in Australia, but the best I could find on the first three pages of Google returns was a single passing-mention in an event calender. The location of the award ceremony itself Googlemaps locates to a theater in a quiet neighborhood ten miles from downtown Sydney (not exactly bringing to mind the idea of celebrities pouring out of limousines onto red carpets while hundreds of flash-bulbs snap). Article, recently created, appears to exist to support the dubious notability claims of other embattled bios, such as A.T.M JEFF. Pax 08:22, 2 March 2015 (UTC)


 * delete lacking significant third party coverage. Pax makes excellent arguments too. LibStar (talk) 12:39, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.