Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afshin David Rahimi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 04:11, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Afshin David Rahimi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article for non-notable dermatologist. Being featured on Beverly Hills Times Magazine shows his efforts at promotion, not his notability. We should not be adding to them. most cited paper is as junior author on a negative result. 59 citations is not significant in experimental medicine. Self-publishing a book intended for prospective patients is not notable either.  DGG ( talk ) 14:23, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I wrote this three years ago, but might not today. The reason was his invention of the "tulip lift". But if that's not enough, I don't feel strongly either way whether or not the page remains (I can't find any significant coverage of the person since his invention). Jeremy112233 ( Lettuce-jibber-jabber? ) 14:28, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 20:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  14:50, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Run-of-the-mill dermatologist, does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ACADEMIC. DGG's research is persuasive. As for his "invention of the tulip lift", this has never even been published that I can find; it appears to be just a cute name for what is basically a routine procedure. (This is a common marketing tool among plastic surgeons.) --MelanieN (talk) 22:01, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Reads like a promotional brochure for his practice. No doubt he is successful in the competitive world of Beverly Hills doctors but that doesn't make him inherently notable. Liz  Read! Talk! 23:05, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete promo advert, no indication why he should be notable in the article Kraxler (talk) 16:53, 10 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.