Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/After Hours (Little River Band album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep After improvement it's clear that this album meets WP:MUSIC. (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 20:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

After Hours (Little River Band album)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

no charting, no other notability; only a track listing - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:09, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as in WP:MUSIC. I'd requested it. No shown reliable sources for this subject. Dekisugi (talk) 16:13, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * delete nothing in the article appears to assert notability for the album itself as a separate entity from the band. Jasynnash2 (talk) 16:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nominator as a vacant article + track list.  coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  16:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MUSIC; insufficient notability for a standalone album. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:53, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm going with keep, on account of WP:MUSIC's Albums section. In short, an album is likely notable if the band is notable, but if it's little more than a track listing, it may be merged to a discography or main article space permitting.  Beyond that, the album is a valid LRB album, and, well, LRB are themselves notable.  -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 20:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources or assertion of notability; fails WP:MUSIC. —  Wen li  (reply here) 04:52, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Attempted to assert notability of album, although unsure if my sources are reliable. Thanks. Wolfer68 (talk) 17:10, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:51, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   —Grahame (talk) 08:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep the new, improved version. Good work -- Mattinbgn\talk 09:05, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep -- what is now a decent stub article on an album from a notable band. - Longhair\talk 09:24, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as album from notable band. Meets WP:MUSIC plus I can remember them.--Sting  Buzz Me...   12:38, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as for other keep items above - I can remember them well SatuSuro 05:28, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as a notable album by a notable band. Meets WP:MUSIC easily.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:05, 26 May 2008 (UTC).
 * Keep a notable album, by a notable band (Little River Band were inducted into the ARIA Hall of Fame in 2004) - single released from the album charted - all of which clearly establishes its notablity. Dan arndt (talk) 04:39, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.