Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/After Midnight Project (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 18:57, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

After Midnight Project (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The band itself is not notable. No secondary source coverage. TYelliot &#124;  Talk  &#124;  Contribs  19:09, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Any reason for picking out this specific EP from their page and not the other two that have their own pages then? I just thought I'd help the fans that might look at this. If you want to erase one, erase them all. dragula_85 &#124;  Talk  &#124; 12:34, 23 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge into band's main page, as not notable enough to warrant it's own page. As for the other albums, They don't seem to have much notability either, and the references (Amazon, Twitter) do not denote notability. As such, I would recommend the same for them. If there are more proofs of notability, I would suggest finding more refs while this is in process. However, I feel deletion would be a step too far, as there is clearly some work put in, and with a bit more, this could be worth reading. Bennydigital (talk) 08:36, 24 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 06:59, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete This album plainly fails the requirements listed at WP:NALBUM. There is a total dearth of reliable, third-party coverage of the record. Frankly, I toyed with the idea of nominating the band's article for deletion as well but... a very quick Google search and GNews search suggests that sufficient coverage probably exists out there, and I don't want to overstep. But this album does not have the benefit of that type of coverage, as far as I can tell. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  07:15, 2 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete no indication how this would pass WP:MUSIC Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 14:46, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.