Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afterhours fm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 04:12, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Afterhours fm

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I originally tagged this with db-spam because it was entirely an advertisement, but it's been removed and rewritten a bit. Regardless, the article is not verifiable by reliable secondary sources. I couldn't find any via Google. --Wafulz 02:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate article:
 * Afterhours


 * Delete Completely unverifiable and NN. --Wildnox(talk) 02:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete No sources to assertain notibility as per WP:N. Not verifiable by reliable sournces as per WP:V.--Dacium 02:38, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Will add sources now —The preceding unsigned comment was added by H4ns9l (talk • contribs).


 * Delete - fails WP:WEB. Alexa ranking 209,289: . Too low. MER-C 05:59, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

From what I understand Alexa rankings are based on sites accessed by IE. The AH community is made up of mainly computer savey users who use other browsers. --68.144.1.36 04:03, 1 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment - New to Wikipedia. Didnt know all these rules. I would like to add this radio station to wikipedia under "afterhours" because 1. it is called Afterhours and 2. it represents the types of music played and heard in the afterhour club scenes around the world. Please tell me if possible. What would need to be done? --H4ns9l 07:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Present multiple non-trivial independent sources about the subject. --Wafulz 19:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per three above. -- Mark ( Talk  |  Contribs  |  Email ) 09:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * keep this seems to be legit sure lets keep itOo7565 18:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This does not address any of the problems that have been brought up by myself or other users. --Wafulz 19:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I added some links for reference. Are they not good enough? Im still learning, trying to figure out how to make it look more professional. I dont see much difference between this and a site like Digitally imported whos only references link back to their own site. Please explain the problem better so i can make the necessary changes --H4ns9l 22:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * These aren't really "idependent sources" about the subject. Have a read through WP:WEB. If Digitally Imported doesn't get sources, I'll probably end up nominating it for deletion as well. Also, sign your posts with four tildes ( ~ ). --Wafulz 21:14, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.