Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ag Against Hunger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. but it sounds like this article could use a lot of attention and updating. Liz Read! Talk! 00:59, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Ag Against Hunger

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Worthy organisation, but I couldn't establish that there are sources to show WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 09:12, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Owen&times;  &#9742;  09:55, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep The current website link is a content farm... see the archive page instead: . The news tab,, has a bunch of sources, all the external links there seem broken+unarchived though. Note, this website has gotten a huge number of IA saves, 1053 total.


 * However, with, , in addition to the Western Farm Press news piece in the article's EL section, this meets WP:GNG in my opinion. The article needs to be pruned down to sourcable information. Darcyisvery cute  (talk) 13:59, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:38, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Organizations.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  15:34, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep As per Darcyisverycute, there are a wealth of quality reliable newspaper sources about this organisation (although I'm not sure about linked sources 3 and 4 as they seem to be primary sources). Either way, with those, the Western Farm Press article, and this article from the American Journal of Transportation, I think this passes GNG. pinktoebeans  (talk) 19:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - But this may need to be updated to reflect change in org structure. I fixed the dead link to their website to what looks like the current one. I think that was confusing people. WilsonP NYC (talk) 00:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.