Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agafonika


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Agafonika

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

PROD removed. Random name that fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT. No sources found outside of dictionary definitions, databases and baby name websites. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 03:51, 5 March 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Already PROD's so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:23, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Russia.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Agafonikha (tributary of the Chema) Russian Wikisource: https://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%91%D0%AD/%D0%92%D0%A2/%D0%90%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%84%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0 (a listing in the Orthodox Theological Encyclopedia) Here's a search on Russian Wikinews: https://ru-wikinews-org.translate.goog/w/index.php?fulltext=1&search=%D0%90%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%84%D0%BE%CC%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0&title=%D0%A1%D0%BB%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%B1%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F:%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BA&ns0=1&_x_tr_sl=ru&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp If you suspect that an article with a Russian name is not notable, you need to look at Russian-language sources, starting with the Russian Wikipedia. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Bottom line, we need more than two opinions here or this will close as No consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:25, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Agafonika is also a river and a titular diocese, as well as a first name for a well-known actress. See these Russian articles: Agafonika Vasilyevna Miropolskaya (1909-1996) - Russian and Soviet theater actress, People's Artist of the RSFSR (1967). titular diocese of Agafonika
 * Also, the article already has two Russian-language book references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 * There are still no English language articles as of present. If someone can prove notability of said subjects and say they will create the articles in the near future then I may be content. I know deleting just to potentially undelete and such may increase bureaucracy but if there’s no guarantee that the articles will be written anytime soon then I’d rather not have the page floating around. And the books you speak of are dictionaries, which generally do not show notability alone. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 16:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @AllTheUsernamesAreInUse There is no requirement sources be in English Mach61 06:38, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I know. My point is that there are no English language articles as of present. The subjects listed by Eastmain may be notable but they have no articles right now. I still don’t think that the Russian sources for the name itself are enough for notability purposes. Even if the articles listed by Eastmain get created, it should probably be converted to a DAB, seeing as we need at least two people to meet WP:NNAME. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 07:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete, name is not notable, pointless to create dab for articles that don't exist (couldn't that be G14'd anyways?) Mach61 07:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.