Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Against Nature (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Against Nature (album)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable contest.no External links no claim to notability and no references to establish notability. Oo7565 (talk) 06:23, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly a notable album - I've expanded the article and added references. I have no idea what the nominator is referring to by "Non-notable contest", or why they believe a lack of external links is a reason for deletion.--Michig (talk) 06:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets notability per WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 10:27, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  15:02, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Fine rescue by Michig. Grandmartin11 (talk) 23:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've already issued a final warning to the nominator, who despite repeated warnings is continuing apparently going through Special:Allpages tagging articles for deletion for spurious reasons. –  iride scent   20:01, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep — Reviewed by multiple notable publications. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 21:51, 19 April 2009 (UTC))
 * Speedy keep Spurious nomination lacking proper WP:BEFORE. Bad form.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.