Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agastopia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 03:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Agastopia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nomination as per WP:NAD. Very strange reading article, both sources appear to be discussions regarding the English language and this topic seems to have no actual bearing to psychology. Statements regarding its rarity are unfounded.    Kadzi    (talk) 14:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.     Kadzi    (talk) 14:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete (regrettably) This was previously proposed for speedy deletion on WP:A11 grounds, and it may still satisfy that criterion, the two (dodgy) sources notwithstanding. That said, if there were more demonstrable substance to this, I'd actually want to keep it as a curio, but given that the article consists only of a dictionary definition plus a couple of unsupported claims (and on a quick search I couldn't find anything to support it either), there's nothing there to keep, once you've pared it down; hence fails WP:NAD. Draftifying it seems pretty pointless, too, seeing as it's taken 6+ years to get this far. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:24, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:06, 4 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete I think this is someone's idea of a joke as the only source I looked at seemed to be some kind of joke book. PainProf (talk) 22:39, 4 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.