Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agatik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Delete G7  Ron h jones (Talk) 16:17, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Agatik

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested prod - no indication that the book passes notability guidelines Travelbird (talk) 15:52, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unless there are sources in another language, there simply seems to be nothing out there to show that this book passes WP:NBOOK.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 17:30, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and it is such a poor article that should not be anywhere near article namespace (it can hardly becalled an article). Also, it was created by an WP:SPA that appears to be favouring a non-notable author. I tried a speedy deletion to no avail. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 19:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Alan. I cannot believe this survived a Speedy Delete. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 20:46, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Admins always take a very cautious approach to speedies. This is wrong in my opinion. We then have to waste time at AfD etc. While it goes thru AfD WP suffers from the crap dumped in it, the article is picked up by search engine spiders, and it also gets put in sites that use a WP database dump. Sigh.... -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:10, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * the problem is that CSD does not apply to books. I just proded Eka Lagnachi Dusri Goshta, which is also very unlikely to pass in the end. But the prod will in all likelihood be contested, and we'll go through an AfD for that one too. In my opinion A7 should be expanded to include clearly nn products and books/articles as well, as - in those cases especially - the background of article creation is often fancruft/promotional. Unless the wording is overly promotional as well, they can't be tagged with G11 so they all end up here. Travelbird (talk) 10:21, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.