Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Age of Empires: Dawn of Man Expansion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. WjBscribe 17:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Age of Empires: Dawn of Man Expansion

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is an unofficial expansion to Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (itself an expansion to Age of Empires), which is not notable enough for inclusion. · AO Talk 20:27, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

*Oppose There are sources that can confirm the information. In fact, some of them are in the article, and many more can be produced. ~ Giggy!  TalkAbout Me 23:23, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I say... Neutral slightly leaning towards oppose ♠  TomasBat   ( @ )  ( Contribs )  ( Sign! ) 20:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Until sources can be produced that validate the information in this article, it is just speculation. -- Cy ru s      An dir on   21:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Just like G1ggy said, there are sources; so that reason for deleting the article doesn´t seem very accurate. ♠  TomasBat   ( @ )  ( Contribs )  ( Sign! ) 01:22, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * A Suggestion: If more sources can be produced, then it would be great if you would produce them. ♠  TomasBat   ( @ )  ( Contribs )  ( Sign! ) 01:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Even with sources, this isn't worth having an article about. It's fine if the section in Age of Empires series is kept, but a complete article to itself is too much. · AO Talk 01:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Now I must say that that is an accurate reason... ♠  TomasBat   ( @ )  ( Contribs )  ( Sign! ) 01:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * But please consider copying all of the information in the article to its section at Age of Empires series before its deletion. ♠  TomasBat   ( @ )  ( Contribs )  ( Sign! ) 02:06, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's okay to have a section, but not a whole article. · AO Talk 13:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, I'm happy with that. I've moved it all over to here, and am thus changing to delete ~  Giggy!  TalkContribsAbout MeTo Do List 03:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Me too, Im also changing to delete now that everything has been moved to the right place. ♠  TomasBat   ( @ )  ( Contribs )  ( Sign! ) 10:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.