Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Age of Ruin (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ethically (Yours) 13:06, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Age of Ruin
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Couldn't establish WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. This survived AfD in 2006, but I think that is simply because Wikipedia has increased its standards in the last 8 years. Boleyn (talk) 20:44, 8 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep has songs available on itunes for a start. is still active and pretty strict in what he considers encyclopedia-worthy, so I'd tend to agree with him. Is mentioned in detail in independent secondary sources. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:54, 8 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per wp:NBAND, it's pretty easy for bands to get onto itunes these days. Unless these guys are notable within their genre, it doesn't look like they've received enough coverage to be encyclopedia worthy I feel like a tourist (talk) 20:57, 8 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep The group put out two albums on Eulogy, which hurdles WP:MUSIC bullet 5's definition of "one of the more important indie labels", and I've added a couple of new references (and removed a copyright violation of one of those references; Allmusic has covered the group extensively). Google searches bring up several more reviews from the online metal press. Chubbles (talk) 01:21, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:21, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:21, 9 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Coverage is sufficient to establish notability. --Michig (talk) 18:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.