Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agent X (Brand)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Philg88 ♦talk 16:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Agent X (Brand)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. Google search reveals no coverage in reliable sources. Citobun (talk) 06:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 24 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. I went through a bunch of search results, and the only possible source I found was the Binghamton Times link already cited, and I'm not sure if it's considered reliable, but even if it is, that's not enough. Colapeninsula (talk) 11:27, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete See Sockpuppet investigations/Smileverse. Both sites that are referenced are essentially created to be referenced here. Note that the author of the Binghamton piece is also listed as a senior reporter at bangalorean.net. This makes it unambiguous spam in my book and I will tag it as such. SmartSE (talk) 17:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.