Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agents of Secret Stuff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:13, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Agents of Secret Stuff

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Fails WP:MOVIE jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 05:02, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 05:20, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notable YouTube film, with over 2 million views in 5 days. First film of its kind, starring multiple YouTube stars and internet celebrities. Wked (talk) 07:28, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep or Incubate . As per above. Aeonx (talk) 09:57, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * First film of its kind? Says who? Weak delete. If you think having two million views on YouTube in five days is enough to prove notability, then you should read WP:WEB. Erpert (let's talk about it) 20:57, 28 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Lacks coverage in reliable sources. It may garner notability in the future, but right now, it isn't. -- Whpq (talk) 18:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - From:WP:MOVIE
 * 1 The film represents a unique accomplishment in cinema, is a milestone in the development of film art, or contributes significantly to the development of a national cinema. ***Most likely one of the first short films (30+ minutes) produced by a small, notable, independent, group based in the U.S. that primarily features Asian actors and culture and is released on Youtube.-
 * 2 The film features significant involvement (ie. one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person -***Wong Fu Productions- and is a major part of his/her career.-Herenthere 20:03, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Putting something on Youtube isn't much of a unique accomplishment when you need to slap that many qualifiers to make it "unique", and even then it's further qualified as "most likely". Is there even any documentation of this in independent reliable sources?   The second critrion is referring to an individual and not a production company.  Again, documentation of any of this?  -- Whpq (talk) 05:01, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.