Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ages of Myst


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:08, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Ages of Myst

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is just an in-universe plot repetition of the various locations in the Myst franchise, and has no notability and references of its own. As such, its just duplication of material from the plot section of various Myst articles and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:56, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * judging from the article, this seems to be indeed correct, but wasn't there an ages of Myst game aswell, that might be notable? I'll do more research into this sunday (when I have time). Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:00, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * You might be thinking of Uru: Ages Beyond Myst. Since the name isn't that similar it would probably be better to redirect Ages of Myst to Myst franchise where the concept of the ages is discussed. GarrettTalk 09:37, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Yup, that's the one. Delete it is then. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Repetition of content that is much better covered in the other Myst related articles, although the pictures could be used in other articles. There does not appear to be a game by this name either, perhaps there is some confusion between the Myst and the Myth (computer game) games, which have similar titles. -- Nick Penguin ( contribs ) 00:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete excessive content that fails WP:FICT and WP:PLOT. Game guide type content, not encyclopedic. AnmaFinotera (talk) 05:03, 15 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 04:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - the small pieces of out-of-universe material that are present don't add up to a seperate article. Given the number of 'making of' magazine articles for this series, such a section might be possible but nothing that can't be merged into the main articles. Marasmusine (talk) 08:55, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.