Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aggressor (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 02:03, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Aggressor (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Appears to fail WP:BAND and WP:GNG. CharlieEchoTango ( contact ) 09:13, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 20 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - I agree this band seem to be excellent self-publicists (their albums are self-published too) and there are no signs of them meeting the WP notability crieria. Sionk (talk) 22:47, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Agree that this group seems to fail the 12 parameters of WP:BAND. Shearonink (talk) 07:26, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete on the merits; the band doesn't meet the requirements of WP:BAND or the GNG. That said, the Usual Caveats do apply; one release that hits the charts and an article would be appropriate. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:14, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.