Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aggrotech / Hellektro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Electro-industrial. Consensus that a standalone article is not merited. Sufficient consensus for a redirect, which is also a reasonable compromise between the other views expressed, but given that both Aggrotech and Hellektro already redirect there I'm going to delete this as redundant. Should anyone want any of the content for merging, please let me know. Michig (talk) 06:44, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Aggrotech / Hellektro

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable music genre with no major reliable coverage - it gets a significant mention on Electro-industrial but not enough to merit it's own article -- samtar talk or stalk 20:44, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. --  samtar talk or stalk 20:45, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * I agree with the nominator. Non-notable, lacking sourcing, etc. Delete. Drmies (talk) 20:47, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I found enough coverage to at least show that the genre exists. Phoenix New Times. That alone doesn't show notability, of course, so for now delete. Perhaps if better sourced, it could be merged to a related electronica page. Yvarta (talk) 20:07, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Change to weak keep. I found more sources that reference it as a genre, enough to show me there's a good chance the topic could be notable with some work. It seems a great number of sources are in German, although I am not as familiar with German publications., , ,  Yvarta (talk) 20:12, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jujutacular (talk) 02:55, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect back to Electro-industrial - First of all, we don't do "slash titles". Second of all, there's no way to say enough about it such that it would merit its own article, as is obvious - when the main gets big enough to warrant it, that's a different story.  Just as an FYI, I don't know that the differentiator is all that noticeable - I've heard or seen several of the bigger cited acts in the "real" article, and I don't really consider them too much different than regular industrial. MSJapan (talk) 04:06, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Electro-industrial I am seriously unable to find enough RS for an article. I think at the moment, the redirect target seems apt and covering it in the larger article is better. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:02, 4 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.