Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agha Iqrar Haroon (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  01:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Agha Iqrar Haroon
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails to meet WP:GNG as well WP:N - delete because its a resume, written by subject himself Special:Contributions/Agha_iqrar_haroon or someone close to them Special:Contributions/Aghaasadharoon.

Also see Dispatch News Desk. Saqib (talk · contribs) 10:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 11:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  Saqib  (talk · contribs) 10:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Journalism.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  15:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. Don't see why this subject is listed under academics and educators. Does not satisty WP:NPROF. Qflib (talk) 17:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I imagine the listing is because the article asserts that the subject's accomplishments include research and teaching. Searching Google Scholar did find a small number of publications under author:ai-haroon, but nothing that would pass WP:PROF. I think we are going to have to look for notability other than through academic accomplishments; I agree he does not pass PROF. That said, I have not yet formulated an opinion on the subject's overall notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:46, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: A wonderful author but didn't meet WP:NAUTHOR. The LEDs said he is a political analyst while it doesn't meet WP:NCREATIVE. Another called "him" a journalist—while I was looking per WP:BEFORE to see any coverage that is historic or passes WP:SIGCOV but to no avail, failing WP:NJOURNALIST. The article about a person just a run of the mill case. The sources doesn't say WP:SIGCOV and made-up like; the wholly sounds WP:UPE, where I can find much PROMO! All the Best!   Otuọcha   (talk) 12:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
 * From the nominator's reason here at the first AFD, it can be possibly recreation of deleted material though was a weak delete. All the Best!  Otuọcha   (talk) 12:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.