Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agile Project Management with Scrum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 16:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Agile Project Management with Scrum
This is a book review for a Microsoft Press book. There being no Cliff's Notes for Microsoft books, the contents of the article is pretty much guaranteed to be original research, and in any case there is not much to be said which is not already on the publisher's website. Guy 14:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. No independnt sources, no assertion of notability. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:36, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Krakatoa  Katie  10:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete —  Per above, wikipedia is not a book-review site, clearly WP:OR. Makes no assertation of notability, and smells slightly of copyvio, or something being written for WP:SPAM purposes.  (Note - I can't find evidence of copyvio, it's just my opinion). M a rtinp23 23:15, 3 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge with the other scrum pages — (esp. Scrum (management) page). There is material here that can be usefully retained, especially the summaries of roles descriptions. Arguably these are lacking in the other pages describing scrum and scrum processes. Schwaber is one of the authorities on scrum, so there are plenty of other sources that can be used to verify the content and accuracy (see the two other scrum pages Scrum (development) and Scrum (management) for other links.  The book mentioned has, itself, a long list of references inside.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.