Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agitprop! Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Black Kite 00:14, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Agitprop! Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

label seems to be non-notable; there are no sources to assert the notability of the label. While it houses two notable artists, inheriting notability works label to artist, not artist to label; if it did, we'd get the very minor indie labels some bands were on before going onto the notable indie labels. Sceptre (talk) 21:51, 28 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:37, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this record label. Joe Chill (talk) 02:00, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I have just added a few sources. They may not be that notable in music history but they appear notable enough in queer history to substantiate an article and sufficient potential for improvement to make deletion unnecessary. Ash (talk) 12:22, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per • Gene93k comments. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  -- Ash (talk) 07:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. This does seem to be a notable "queer music" label in a genre known for misogyny and homophobia. Also it serves as a good list repository for the artists/bands who are not themselves notable and Internet archives has years of the labels websites which includes media reviews, press releases etc so a good article is certainly do-able. -- Banj e  b oi   22:57, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep This does now seem to have some sources. --Simon Speed (talk) 13:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.