Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnes Callard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep, withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:08, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Agnes Callard

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG Less Unless (talk) 11:07, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 11:07, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 11:07, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

*Delete. Non-notable and almost no context. Pamzeis (talk) 11:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. A significal national level award (2020 Lebowitz Prize from the American Philosophical Association), plus the 2019 Guggenheim Fellowship, that's already enough to satisfy WP:PROF, without looking further. Nsk92 (talk) 14:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. While citations look light for WP:NPROF C1, the Guggenheim Fellowship is a pass of WP:NPROF C2.  The Lebowitz prize helps support, and her book has several reviews  towards WP:NAUTHOR (helpfully linked from her web page).  Altogether, looks like a solid notability case. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 16:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, precisely per . I was going to link her UChicago page too. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:32, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:33, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:33, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep "Ancient philosophy and ethics" sounds like one of those academic specialties where citation counts are typically uninformative and we should look to other indicia. The Guggenheim Fellowship is enough for WP:PROF, I'd say. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 21:26, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 11:40, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 11:40, 5 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Withdraw I'm gladly withdrawing my nomination. I was obviously mistaken.Less Unless (talk) 12:07, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment. Although your withdrawal of support for deletion is noted, the AfD can't be closed as a speedy keep unless User:Pamzeis also withdraws their support. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:27, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , the one !vote to delete has now been withdrawn, so closing would be reasonable. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 03:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.