Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnitum (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Agnitum
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Small private company. Generic. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:ORGCRIT. A notability tag has been present since mid-2017.  scope_creep Talk  15:34, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Apparently the company no longer exists and article writer has given permission for the article to be deleted.   scope_creep Talk  15:09, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: As much as soft delete could be suitable, would like additional involvement before closing.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 15:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete: and other PCMag content look significant. Article writer requesting deletion doesn't appear to be CSD-applicable as the page has had reasonable contributions from multiple people. However, the article contains a lot of promotional content and I'm not convinced the PCMag content would be enough to justify an article on its own. — Bilorv ( talk ) 01:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I have made improvements to the article, some more maintenance should be enough. Firestar464 (talk) 11:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * You have put some CN tags in places and fixed some spelling. That is not improving the article. Lets look at the references:
 * *  Company profile page. Non-RS. WP:SIRS
 * * Yandex acquired Agnitum technology for Yandex Browser  Company block. Self-published sourced. Fails WP:SPIP and WP:SIRS
 * * [] Dead link.
 * * Firewall guide. Non-RS. No mention of the company.
 * * Editors choice award for a single magazine. URL doesn't resolve. Fails WP:ORGIND, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:SIRS.    scope_creep Talk  18:31, 19 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: I see sources related to the subject, but subject does not have WP:SIGCOV "addressing the topic directly and in detail". Fails WP:GNG, WP:ORGCRIT, WP:NCORP.   // Timothy ::  talk  22:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.