Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnivesh Jyotiraditya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:58, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Agnivesh Jyotiraditya

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Fails WP:AUTHOR, non-notable JMHamo (talk) 20:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

*ARTICLE TO BE KEPT Very appropriate article about a unique achiever which undoubtedly needs to be kept.

1. Notability - in accordance with the Wikipedia guidelines several significant secondary references are given which are independently verifiable and cannot be ignored. The newspapers and media cited in the article are prominent leading newspapers in the country with millions of readers. ( kindly note that Wikipedia has retained many pages with trivial references with titles Revathi Thirunal Balagopal Varma, Vidhubala, Science Olympiad Foundation, Kumar Padmanabh Singh etc where no one has nominated those for deletion and here this article about a young achiever itself is unique and motivational)

2 notability - guidelines state a person winning multiple awards for his works is notable and this article satisfies that clause also (along with other guidelines)  with the list of awards and works given.

3. Author- the guideline for category author is adhered to successfully as the person's works are a part of the Don Bosco Museum and Cebtre of indegenous cultures which is a prominent museum in India and is displayed there and has been cited in leading newspapers.

4. The topic is well notable and attracts wide attention and a Google search on the topic itself produces numerous links and news that shows the significance and notability of the same.

5. Wikipedia is the encyclopaedia for common man to easily search for topics that he needs and such a highly searched topic is very much relevant here.

6. The topic itself inspires many like me due to the various fields of work undertaken by a youngster and the article ould be also considered as a special case for notability and relevance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noble Faith (talk • contribs) 09:31, 6 April 2017 (UTC) — Noble Faith (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   17:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Strong delete The "reliable sources" are local special interest coverage that do not show the type of coverage we expect from actual reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2017 (UTC)


 * strongly recommend to keep the article

The resources cited are not local but prominent newspapers which have wide circulation in different parts of India and not confined to a region alone. It's wrong to say with special interest when coverage comes in media  from different parts of the country. No national museum will display works that is not competent enough. It is a very much relevant and significant article that deserves to be kept with more than 15 resources that are prominent newspapers of the country and not to be accused of special interest! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fan in Awe (talk • contribs) 08:14, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

The entry about the young achiever is inspirational and authentic. Many well known references.It is worth being kept in wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:630A:F35E:2C11:36F6:972C:346E (talk) 15:38, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

* Authentic article quoting reliable resources. Strongly recommended to keep. Great achievements for a young kid — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.247.254.67 (talk) 03:03, 12 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete As per nomination. The article itself is a breathless collection of non-verifiable or barely verifiable facts.  Youngest black belt in the world indeed.Peter Rehse (talk) 09:26, 7 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete (but open to being swayed if there's proof of award significance, bestseller, other key evidence of notability) - There are a few sources, but not enough to be considered "significant" and a news show that back up the points in the article, but the "best selling" part is hard to substantiate. I'm not finding what organization may have considered him a best-seller - and I cannot find an authority/identity record for him, except perhaps this "sparse" VIAF record under Monu. I don't find an authority/identity under his birth name. I am not finding information that the awards are particularly notable, except perhaps "Kamala Surayya Award" which is listed as an award under List of Malayalam literary awards, but I cannot find an independent source saying he won that award. Although he sounds to be quite a talented boy, I am not finding enough to establish notability at this time. This is possibly a case of WP:TOOSOON.–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:42, 9 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.