Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnosco Technologies Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deletion (G11). (Non-admin closure) AllyD (talk) 06:19, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Agnosco Technologies Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Procedural AfD. Created four times today and deleted as G11 (spam) each time, yet makes some sort of claim to notability (revenues of £1bn), so bringing it here. Sourced to nothing except primary sources. Black Kite (talk) 20:13, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Correction to Black Kite: They don't have revenue of $1 billion. The current version says, somewhat clumsily, "Agnosco maps to prolong their strengthening trend by expanding more offices nationwide and globally, exceeding $1 Billion in revenue." I don't know whether "maps to" is a known locution that means "plans to" in some parts of the world, but previous versions of the article were clearer: that their goal is to reach $1 billion in annual revenue. This was part of the "gee, we're so excited about our own prospects" feel of the article that led me to tag it as promotional in the first place. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:29, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Fair point - I missed that. In that case, the article has even less reason to exist. Black Kite (talk) 20:34, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete This article looks more like a Facebook profile than an encyclopedic article. I agree with —Largo Plazo's point of view that it appears to mean that $1 billion is a goal. It is therefore, not notable in any way.


 * Delete. There is hardly any coverage, and what coverage there is is just a mirror of what's on the company website. --Jakob (Scream about the things I've broken) 21:46, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.