Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agonophilia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 16:47, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Agonophilia

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable, unreferenced, and unlikely to become so.

Delete. Non-notable.— James Cantor (talk) 16:08, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Comment Searching for sources, it seems this term does actually exist, and has some information available about it. The problem is, the definition that I'm finding is substantially different than what is presented in this article. The article presents this fetish as sexualizing combative sports and sports equipment, where as the actual use of this term seems to be about being sexually aroused by having your partnet pretend to struggle, or "pseudo-rape". With this in mind, I'm not sure if it would be easier to keep this article and then just completely rewrite it, or to go ahead and delete it and recreate it from scratch with proper information. Rorshacma (talk) 17:18, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. A redirect to Biastophilia could also serve the purpose.


 * Delete I agree that there's a lack of notability for the phrase with this meaning. However, there's not many reliable cites for it meaning fetish for performing rape, so I'm not sure a redirect will work either without an obvious target. RightDiagnosis.com claims it can mean either fetish for fighting/wrestling generally or rape, but I'm not sure how reliable that is. An incorrect redirect isn't much use, and in any case it's closer to a dictionary definition than an encyclopedia article, so I say we delete until there's more sources with greater detail. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:53, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.