Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agoro Community Development Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. I'm closing this as no consensus, instead of keep, due to the fact that one of the !votes was from a SPA. With this discussion being open for quite some time (and being relisted twice) I don't see a third relisting doing anything to benefit the discussion. The article has been updated slightly by Margin1522 (thank you). NPSAR is also in play here. Cheers. (non-admin closure) Dusti*Let's talk!* 01:06, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Agoro Community Development Association

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

From my research, this organization appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:ORG. I could be wrong, and though! Thanks to all who participate in this discussion. Missvain (talk) 08:36, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Delete – I guess we don't have much choice on GNG or ORG grounds. There is one page of Google results, with most of the hits being mentions in index-type articles. There were these two hits, from UN and WHO bulletins.
 * Comment – Background, what I could find. The links in the article are dead, last update in the Wayback Machine was 2007, last update to current site at acda.respectrefugees.org was 2008. One mention in a book from 2007. So hard to say if the organization exists anymore. The author created a number of articles in 2007 – all on related refugee programs, most of them flagged or already deleted for notability – and hasn't been back since. (Apparently the community that it served in Agoro is slowly coming back )  – Margin1522 (talk) 11:40, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment – After another look at the two sources from the UN and WHO, I am changing my !vote to keep. Especially the UN Volunteers source was an in-depth profile, which I now think is enough for notability. And now there is the prospect that the website will be updated. If this article is updated I think it could be valuable when linked to our other articles about the conflict and the work that was done after it and today. – Margin1522 (talk) 16:14, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 19:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 19:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - The Herald (here I am) 13:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 January 31.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 13:48, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep Following the death of our director in 2010,work on our site was lost. We are however working with respect International to get our site updated soon. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timberphens (talk • contribs) 14:29, 5 February 2015
 * Comment I have added the above !vote by, who had added it after blanking the page. Thanks for the information, Timberphens, but please don't blank the page – we need to keep a record of this discussion. If you could give us any new published information about the organization that would help. Also, the discussion isn't over yet, so we may end up keeping the article. – Margin1522 (talk) 15:26, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 10:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.