Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agrammatism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  04:36, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Agrammatism
Wikipedia not a dictionary --64.231.65.219 06:31, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It seems you forgot to create a deletion discussion page for this article. I'm not sure how to fix that... Anyway, the article has been improved so much now by user Samir that I think it qualifies for Speedy Keep. David Sneek 08:11, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, it is now a bit more than a dictionary definition and could be expanded at least a little further. -- Kjkolb 08:40, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Lambiam Talk 08:43, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep the rewrite.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  12:11, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Current version looks like a Keep. Colon el Tom 14:08, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.