Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agri-Fab


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 22:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Agri-Fab

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Nothing notable, nor relevant per GNG. No SIGCOV Gavrover (talk) 20:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Illinois.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  01:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete based on the article I expected more coverage to exist, but after checking news and books I'm Just Not Seeing It. Disappointing, as it is quite a well constructed article with nice prose and structure and pictures. BrigadierG (talk) 01:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete: Can't find sigcov sufficient to meet WP:NCORP (and even reviews of its products are relatively thin -- though perhaps more likely in specialty publications). Could in theory be redirected to Sullivan,_Illinois to preserve cats, but it doesn't appear to be a significant enough company for that middle-ground to be needed. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 14:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG ,lacks indepth coverage.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.