Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agricultural Museum (Malaysia)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:52, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Agricultural Museum (Malaysia)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ORG. Insufficient indepth coverage LibStar (talk) 15:19, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Another 8 references have been added (including 6 from Utusan Online websites and 1 from the city council website). Chongkian (talk) 01:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * references 1 to 9 merely confirm existence of the museum. LibStar (talk) 14:53, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:59, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:59, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:59, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk  14:45, 18 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 20:43, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 13:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
 * hey is just an essay. Whilst it looks like a lot of sources, 1-10 merely confirms existence of the gallery. LibStar (talk) 15:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Strong keep In general, a Museum is notable. WP:N says "Nationally well-known local organizations: Some organizations are local in scope, but have achieved national or even international notice. Organizations whose activities are local in scope (e.g., a school or club) can be considered notable if there is substantial verifiable evidence of coverage by reliable independent sources outside the organization's local area. Where coverage is only local in scope, consider adding a section on the organization to an article on the organization's local area instead." - there are ten different sources which confirm it's notability, which also show "wide spread coverage", and importance. Dusti*Let's talk!* 16:02, 1 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.