Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agriculture in Romania


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cirt (talk) 06:04, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Agriculture in Romania

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A duplicate of Economy of Romania bdude (talk) 09:40, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, no, this is a sub-article of the Economy of Romania article, which is evident by the text "Main article: Agriculture in Romania" present in Economy of Romania. There are many "Agriculture in" articles, but if necessary, the information in this article could be merged into Economy of Romania according to WP:PRESERVE, so deletion is not an option. --Pixelface (talk) 09:58, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note The majority of the information is already in Economy of Romania. --10:27, 27 October 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bdude (talk • contribs)
 * It appears when Nergaal replaced the redirect present at Agriculture in Romania with text, it was a copy-paste from Economy of Romania (the first revision of Agriculture in Romania is identical to this version of Economy of Romania from November 21, 2007). The only text in this article that is not present in Economy of Romania is "Romania is also one of the world's largest suppliers of agricultural products, particularly of wheat and other grains. Romania is a major exporter of agricultural products, to the United States but also to Europe and East Asia." The Economy of Romania section does currently have more information. I think redirecting this to Economy of Romania would be the best thing to do now. If that section grows too large, it could be spunoff into Agriculture in Romania. --Pixelface (talk) 10:58, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The main article is getting too long, so material from the existing section should be condensed, rather than deleting the split-off. - Mgm|(talk) 10:31, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.   -- VG &#x260E; 11:27, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Wikipedia fields several other "Part of economy in Romania" articles and the section for Agriculture has grown sufficiently large to qualify a separate article. D ARTH P ANDA talk 11:51, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge as Pixel mentions above, I meant to work on the economy article a long time ago, and the first step was to move information into separate articles. Unfortunately I was disappointed by the humongous amount of vandalism on the economy page so I stopped working on that page at all. As long as all the information from the subarticle is covered in the main article I am happy for it to be merged/redirected at least for now... Nergaal (talk) 13:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep And let the main editors there sort out what to spin out. Certainly notable and sourceble. -- Banj e  b oi   14:06, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep And trim Economy of Romania. Taemyr (talk) 20:54, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Useful article, encyclopedic. Merging would be okay but it looks as if it may be too large and it's better to have a separate article. A is putting the smack down (talk) 21:54, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. A significant enough topic in itself that will be built on over the coming years. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:40, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's hard to believe that anyone would propose deleting an article about a nation's agriculture. Everyking (talk) 05:00, 31 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.