Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agustin Fabian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Agustin Fabian

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable writer. Winged Blades Godric 15:56, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as there are claims of nationally significant notability, attempts to actually improve or find such in the relevant forms should be made and there's nothing to suggest this was considered as an alternative; especially given this is from the last century and from a place the Internet is not as largely available, especially given the subject. Besides clear policy violations, there's no genuine basis for deletion. SwisterTwister   talk  16:48, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * It's an AfD; not a CSD.Thus claims don't matter, their truth value and verifiabilty matters.Also, what did you mean by clear policy violations?And that sources from the 17th/18 th century are unavailable hardly means we become a census directory for all those living in the era.And more importantly, the onus of inclusion is on the one willing to have the subject included in WP.Thanks! Winged Blades Godric 04:38, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  01:34, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  01:34, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment Fabian was a 20th century writer, so the 17th and 18th centuries are not material. That said, we need people to identify the sources, not just hand wave and claim they exist somewhere.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:25, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:21, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Tentative keep -- here's a review of a book that devotes significant material to the subject:
 * "In the second part called “Tagalog Literature,” she delves into the development and history of Tagalog novels, as well as the life and works of writers like Agustin Fabian and Macario Pineda." (Source: Book review: The subversive Soledad Reyes.
 * This is indicative of notability. More sources are likely to exist in Tagalog. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:58, 4 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - Definitely a notable author. I've added a number of citations to the article to help showcase this notability. I also added more info to the article.--SouthernNights (talk) 00:39, 7 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.