Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad Behbahani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:06, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Ahmad Behbahani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Pure speculation, one strongly doubted report

Ahmad Behbahani arises from a single reported conversation said to have taken place with a self-identified individual. The report was never verified and the claim was strongly doubted by the NY Post on the basis that the claimant was too young to have been the person he claimed to be, which is just about as damning a challenge as one could imagine. The original claim was never repeated and does not seem to have been reported again thereafter. Lockerbie is a hot and notable topic but that does not make every rumour, speculation, unsubstantiated report or unverified claim worthy of reproduction on WP. At most, someone might want to add a brief note about this on a Lockerbie page. sirlanz 08:20, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:49, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:49, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:12, 2 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep he comes up often when talking about the Lockerbie attack. Even a basic search comes up with references  (references a 60 Minutes interview) . He is kind of a case study in the vagaries of Human Sources like CURVEBALL was.  J bh  Talk  06:23, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yellow Dingo&#160;(talk) 05:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.