Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad Nawaz Khan Jadoon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to PK-42 Abbottabad-I as a valid ATD against which a case has not been made (vs. an opinion cast) Star   Mississippi  02:05, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Ahmad Nawaz Khan Jadoon

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails NPOL as well GNG. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 12:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   [[User:CanonNi ]]  (talk • contribs) 01:56, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —  Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 12:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:47, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to PK-42 Abbottabad-I as a valid search term (WP:ATD), and add details there. WP:NPOL is just a rule of thumb to quickly judge if the topic would meet WP:GNG (read the introductory sentence of WP:NBIO: On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. and now read the parent guideline WP:SNG: The subject-specific notability guidelines generally include verifiable criteria about a topic which show that appropriate sourcing likely exists for that topic. Therefore, topics which pass an SNG are presumed to merit an article, though articles which pass an SNG or the GNG may still be deleted or merged into another article, especially if adequate sourcing or significant coverage cannot be found, or if the topic is not suitable for an encyclopedia.). Once notified for AfD, only WP:GNG matters, so please cite WP:GNG while nominating articles. If all we have are statistics of how many votes these crook politicians received then stand-alone articles are not needed. 2400:ADC7:5104:3D00:4CD8:6849:1280:7FB9 (talk) 10:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 * 2400:ADC7:5104:3D00:4CD8:6849:1280:7FB9, IP - So are you suggesting that we shoud redirect BLP of every single candidate to their constituency's article? With about 20,000 candidates in the 2024 election alone, I'm sure this is not a good precedent we are setting here. —  Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 10:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 * You Are right brother Saqib, we should not go for every candidate, actually this person is General Secretary of one of leading Nationalist Pakhtun Party name Qaumi Watan Party and you know General Secretary is second most important person in an organization after Chairman. That is my point, we should made an article for his details,
 * Thank you for you support and understanding Tasawar Waris (talk) 07:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.