Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad Noorani (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The article has been listed for more than 3 weeks, no clear vision of whether the subject is notable or not. Less Unless (talk) 20:40, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Ahmad Noorani
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Pakistani investigative journalist, only notability here is that he was beaten up. While reprehensible, I believe it does not confer notability. Fails WP:GNG. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:25, 11 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:22, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Pakistan. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:25, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment He was not beaten up during any ordinary street crime. According to the cited sources, he had traced out some undisclosed assets of an influential person holding a public office, and as a result he was harassed in the line of duty.Insight 3 (talk) 17:41, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:26, 25 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TigerShark (talk) 02:49, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment While not my area of expertise, in some parts of the world standing up to people in power and going public with evidence of corruption is quite a feat. Perhaps the article should also elaborate on his journalism start up, "Fact Focus". Proton Dental (talk) 08:57, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.