Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad Treaudo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Ifnord 21:26, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Ahmad Treaudo
who — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hey 2006 (talk • contribs)


 * Comment: This AfD was created and edited by the above user and not listed at AfD; I've now listed it. No vote. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note? ) 00:48, 19 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. AfD is not for expansion.  Chick Bowen 00:52, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable as article currently stands. -- Oscar The Cat talk [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px]] 01:00, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is simply a stub. As a side note, I find questionable the recent unsigned, unreasoned AfD postings. -- Jay  (Reply)  01:02, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment All athlete articles get kept, as surely as all school ones do -- Ruby  01:31, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. 20,000 Google hits on a member of the Atlanta Falcons team.  It's a valid stub and satisfies WP:V.  Antandrus  (talk) 01:33, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * EXTRA STRONG SPEEDY KEEP nominator of AfD is a vandal, nuff said. M o e   ε  01:39, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, would be speedy keep but a good-faith vote to delete has been made. Adrian~enwiki (talk) 02:17, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable gridiron player. Would have been speedy keep if not for good faith delete vote. Capitalistroadster 03:44, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Jim62sch 04:06, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep --Ter e nce Ong 04:32, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep -- S iva1979 Talk to me  15:21, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. He's on the practice squad, not the team. Is this a relaxation of notability standards? Is he the athletic world's non-notable equivalent of an understudy who never gets onstage? Monicasdude 16:02, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Very weak keep he is a memember of the practice squad of the team, still not in the team yet, Most players who are in the practice squads don't normally go higher and normally get released, clearly bad timing for the AFD, possible delete later if he gets cut and don't play a pro game. --Jaranda wat's sup 02:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep on the verge of NN.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:49, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep --James 01:58, 24 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.