Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmass Fakahany


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Ahmass Fakahany

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability claim is borderline, and the page was likely written by one or more WP:UPEs. Nathan2055talk - contribs 22:54, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:13, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Needs discussion of the sources added by DESiegel.
 * Delete His food business may be notable, but he has no notability without it, so maybe we should have an article on that business, but clearly not on him.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:08, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - While the subject is mentioned in a number of WP:RS, their notability seems to be tangential at best. Most of the sources cited are either focuses on Fakahany's businesses/awards (all of which fail Wikipedia's redlink test for notable awards) or contain WP:PRIMARY information. In addition, none of the sources seem to put forward a credible claim to show how the subject is individually different and encyclopedic notable when compared to other, similar businesspeople (WP:MILL). Couple this with the likely WP:UDP/WP:NOTPROMO activity surrounding this article and delete is point I am reaching. SamHolt6 (talk) 12:35, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment It seems to me that a person who is the owner and CEO of a global company, and had previously been the COO of Merrill Lynch, would most likely be notable, although those do not alone guarantee notability. I have not yet done a WP:BEFORE search on this person. The nominator does nor mention the results of any BEFORE search. I wonder what, if anything, was found. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 12:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTLINKEDIN. Two days ago, I templated the page creator with uw-paid1, asking him if he's paid or not. He hasn't replied. —Unforgettableid (talk) 13:58, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * comment the nominator looks like habitual and his all contributions are to delete the pages. I am dumb, user:DGG is dumb who accepted the page to main space but nominator knows everything because he made 10K edits and damaged thousands of pages. With this speed only a few pages will be left. JK.Kite (talk) 20:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The article is at best borderline acceptable as it stands, the nomination is correct in that much. If you think it should be kept, the best way is to find additional quality sources and point them out. If you think that the nominator has been abusing the AfD process, this can be reported at WP:ANI, otherwise don't cast WP:ASPERSIONS, please. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 22:24, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Per WP:Notable, WP:NPOV, WP:PAID editing is very much apparent and why hasn't this been hit with a CSD G11? ♥ Melody ♥ 21:15, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * It was tagged with G11, and that was declined, by me, before this nomination. See the history. I stand by my view that it is not a G11. And neither WP:Notable, WP:NPOV, nor WP:PAID are valid reasons for speedy deletion. WP:PAID is not, in fact, a valid reason for deletion at all. There have been several proposals to make it one, none have achieved consensus, and in my view rightly so. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 22:20, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I have added sources, and will be adding more. In my view this already passews the GNG. The article currently has 2 NY Times articles, 1 Forbes (albeit by a contributor, so of less value), 1 Inc.com article, 1 Business Insider, and several others, for a current total of 20 citations. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 00:24, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per WP:SIGCOV, WP:BARE, and WP:HEY, based on at least one Times article entirely about him, as well as other sources. However, it still needs a lot of work, so I would not oppose userfication. Bearian (talk) 20:49, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: This is primarily a promotional article with little if any notabillity therein. References I checked appeared to be Primary. Whiteguru (talk) 08:26, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 05:57, 19 August 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Still need to evaluate the keep comments.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tone 07:43, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Contrary to some of the view above, I don't see that his involvement in food business meets the threshold of notability, but his role as one of the major "perpetrators" of the financial crisis is very clear and well-documented by the Times and other sources. Fiachra10003 (talk) 12:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment. Per the essay WP:THREEREFS, it'd be best to have three sources with three green checkmarks each. Dear If a source doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV, why mention it in an AfD discussion?

Kind regards, —Unforgettableid (talk) 07:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.