Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed AlNeaimy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 04:38, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Ahmed AlNeaimy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable person. No reliable source discusses him significantly and the sources cited in the article are mostly "How-to" guides with a single mention of him. King And God 14:56, 19 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Obvious self-promotion.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 17:02, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   ATZNA   19:53, 19 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep - self-promotion is possible. However he without doubt passes GNG. His pogramming is notable per GNG, please view the references in the article of the subject.  ATZNA   20:03, 19 April 2018 (UTC)  This account is a sock Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 02:16, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.   ATZNA   20:05, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.   ATZNA   20:05, 19 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines. Essentially no coverage in independent, third party reliable sources.  Jbh  Talk  22:06, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Very passing mention as a co-creator of limited interest technology, with no biographical information contained in any of the sources. Lacks substantial coverage. WP:TOOSOON is a kind assessment. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:27, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Self promotion with a bunch of unreliable sources. –Ammarpad (talk) 03:49, 21 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.